“School of Philosophy”

Back to Papers Home
Back to Papers of School of Philosophy

Paper   IPM / Philosophy / 13115
School of Analytic Philosophy
  Title:   The Dogmatism Paradox and the Problem of Misleading Evidence
  Author(s):  Hamid Vahid
  Status:   Published
  Journal: Teorema
  No.:  1
  Vol.:  31
  Year:  2012
  Pages:   47-57
  Supported by:  IPM
  Abstract:
It seems uncontroversial that if one knows (is justified in believing) that p, one knows (is justified in believing) that any contrary evidence to p will be misleading. But this has a paradoxical consequence, as it would seem to allow us to ignore any contrary evidence should one actually encounter it. In this paper, after criticizing a number of solutions of the puzzle, I offer my own proposal which involves a reappraisal of the notion of misleading evidence.

Download TeX format
back to top
Clients Logo
Clients Logo
Clients Logo
Clients Logo
Clients Logo
Clients Logo
Clients Logo
Clients Logo
scroll left or right