IPM

“ Schools ”

Astronomy
Cognitive Sciences
Computer Science
Mathematics
Nano-Science
Particles and Accelerators
Philosophy
Physics

“ Centers and Units ”

GCG Computing Group
Information Center
Iranian Light Source Facility
Iranian National Observatory
IRNIC
Library
Network Center

“ Research Groups ”

Bioinformatics
Combinatorics and Computing
Commutative Algebra
Logic
IPM HPC Laboratory

“ Useful Links ”

Gallery of Visitors
Contact Us
Gallery of Photos

“ E-Services ”

Webmail
Official Automation System
Library
Telephone Book

“School of Philosophy”

Paper IPM / Philosophy / 12247

School of Analytic Philosophy
Title:	Laws and counterfactuals: defusing an argument against the Humean view of laws
Author(s):	kaave Lajevardi
Status:	Published
Journal:	Dialogue
No.:	04
Vol.:	50
Year:	2011
Pages:	751-758
Supported by:	IPM

Abstract:

Appealing to the failure of counterfactual support is a standard device in refuting a Humean view on laws of nature: some true generalizations do not support relevant counterfactuals; therefore not every true general fact is a law of nature?so goes the refutation. I will argue that this strategy does not work, for our understanding of the truth-value of any counterfactual is grounded in our understanding of the lawhood of some statements related to it.

Download TeX format